↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Examining genotypic variation in autism spectrum disorder and its relationship to parental age and phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in The Application of Clinical Genetics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Examining genotypic variation in autism spectrum disorder and its relationship to parental age and phenotype
Published in
The Application of Clinical Genetics, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/tacg.s112712
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Geier, Janet K Kern, Lisa K Sykes, Mark R Geier

Abstract

Previous studies on genetic testing of chromosomal abnormalities in individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) found that ~80% have negative genetic test results (NGTRs) and ~20% have positive genetic test results (PGTRs), of which ~7% were probable de novo mutations (PDNMs). Research suggests that parental age is a risk factor for an ASD diagnosis. This study examined genotypic variation in ASD and its relationship to parental age and phenotype. Phenotype was derived from detailed clinical information, and genotype was derived from high-resolution blood chromosome and blood whole-genome copy number variant genetic testing on a consecutive cohort (born: 1983-2009) of subjects diagnosed with ASD (N=218). Among the subjects examined, 80.3% had NGTRs and 19.7% had PGTRs, of which 6.9% had PDNMs. NGTR subjects were born more recently (the risk of PDNMs decreasing by 12% per more recent birth year) and tended to have an increased male-female ratio compared to PDNM subjects. PDNM subjects had significantly increased mean parental age and paternal age at subject's birth (the risk of a PDNM increasing by 7%-8% per year of parental or paternal age) compared to NGTR subjects. PGTR and NGTR subjects showed significant improvements in speech/language/communication with increasing age. PGTR subjects showed significant improvements in sociability, a core feature of an ASD diagnosis, with increasing age, whereas NGTR subjects showed significant worsening in sociability with increasing age. This study helps to elucidate different phenotypic ASD subtypes and may even indicate the need for differential diagnostic classifications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 21%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,890,803
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,541
of 368,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them