↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s82119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengcheng Liu, Xing Wu, Hui Shi, Run Liu, Hexi Shu, JinPeng Gong, Yong Yang, Qi Sun, Jiezhou Wu, Xiaoyang Nie, Ming Cai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,281
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,900
of 281,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.