↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Association Between Blood Eosinophils and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Blood Eosinophils and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/copd.s289920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Yang, Junchao Yang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,589,130
of 20,398,654 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,425
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,412
of 313,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,398,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them