↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cubosome nanoparticles potentiate immune properties of immunostimulants

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Cubosome nanoparticles potentiate immune properties of immunostimulants
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s110406
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenguang Liu, Li Luo, Sisi Zheng, Yale Niu, Ruonan Bo, Yee Huang, Jie Xing, Zhihua Li, Deyun Wang

Abstract

Cubosomes have been explored as drug and antigen carriers in the past few years. A few reports have described that cubosomes can enhance the ability of immunostimulants to generate strong immune responses. Polysaccharide (PS), an immunostimulant, has been reported to be a promising adjuvant for vaccines. Herein, we incorporated PS into cubosomes to generate PS-cubosome (Cub-PS) nanoparticles, and Cub-PS was characterized by small-angle X-ray scattering scattering and cryo-field emission scanning electron microscopy. The immunological activity of Cub-PS was compared with that of Cub and PS. The results demonstrated that Cub-PS elicited more potent immune responses than Cub or PS alone. The enhanced immune responses might be attributed to the promotion of antigen transport into draining lymph nodes and efficient dendritic cell activation and memory T-helper cell differentiation in draining lymph nodes. Overall, these findings indicate that cubosomes have the potential to enhance the ability of immunostimulants to generate an immune response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 4 6%
Chemistry 3 4%
Materials Science 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#655
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,283
of 367,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#16
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.