↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New targeted treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer – role of nivolumab

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
New targeted treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer – role of nivolumab
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/btt.s87878
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giulia Zago, Mirte Muller, Michel van den Heuvel, Paul Baas

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease, where it is no longer amenable to curative treatment. During the last decades, the survival has only improved significantly for lung cancer patients who have tumors harboring a driver mutation. Therefore, there is a clear unmet need for effective therapies for patients with no mutation. Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for different cancer types. Nivolumab, a monoclonal inhibitory antibody against PD-1 receptor, can prolong survival of NSCLC patients, with a manageable toxicity profile. In two Phase III trials, nivolumab was compared to docetaxel in patients with, respectively, squamous (CheckMate 017) and non-squamous NSCLC (CheckMate 057). In both trials, nivolumab significantly reduced the risk of death compared to docetaxel (41% and 27% lower risk of death for squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, respectively). Therefore, nivolumab has been approved in the US and in Europe as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. Unfortunately, accurate predictive factors for patient selection are lacking, making it difficult to decide who will benefit and who will not. Currently, there are many ongoing trials that evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab in different settings and in combination with other agents. This paper reviews the present literature about the role of nivolumab in the treatment of NSCLC. Particular attention has been given to efficacy studies, toxicity profile, and current and emerging predictive factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 35 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,443,636
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#193
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,466
of 381,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them