↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pain perception: predictive value of sex, depression, anxiety, somatosensory amplification, obesity, and age

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pain perception: predictive value of sex, depression, anxiety, somatosensory amplification, obesity, and age
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s106974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuksel Kivrak, Hatice Kose-Ozlece, Mehmet Fatih Ustundag, Mehmet Asoglu

Abstract

Factors affecting pain sensation are still being investigated. In this study, we aimed to examine the effects of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), somatosensory amplification, anxiety, and depression on the perception of pain. Venipuncture was performed on 140 healthy individuals. All the cases completed a sociodemographic data form, visual analog scale (VAS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory, and Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Height and weight were also measured. When both the sexes were compared, there was no difference in terms of VAS, BMI, age, and Beck Depression Inventory, but Somatosensory Amplification Scale and BAI were found to be higher in females. A correlation was found among VAS points, BAI, and BMI. The results of a regression analysis show that the BAI score is a predictor for the VAS score. These results indicate that anxiety may be a predictor of pain, whereas sex, depression, somatosensory amplification, age, and weight do not appear to influence the perception of pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 5%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,506
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,651
of 381,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#59
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.