↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Adoption of e-health technology by physicians: a scoping review
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s103881
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe de Grood, Aida Raissi, Yoojin Kwon, Maria Jose Santana

Abstract

The goal of this scoping review was to summarize the current literature identifying barriers and opportunities that facilitate adoption of e-health technology by physicians. Scoping review. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases as provided by Ovid were searched from their inception to July 2015. Studies captured by the search strategy were screened by two reviewers and included if the focus was on barriers and facilitators of e-health technology adoption by physicians. Full-text screening yielded 74 studies to be included in the scoping review. Within those studies, eleven themes were identified, including cost and liability issues, unwillingness to use e-health technology, and training and support. Cost and liability issues, unwillingness to use e-health technology, and training and support were the most frequently mentioned barriers and facilitators to the adoption of e-health technology. Government-level payment incentives and privacy laws to protect health information may be the key to overcome cost and liability issues. The adoption of e-health technology may be facilitated by tailoring to the individual physician's knowledge of the e-health technology and the use of follow-up sessions for physicians and on-site experts to support their use of the e-health technology. To ensure the effective uptake of e-health technologies, physician perspectives need to be considered in creating an environment that enables the adoption of e-health strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 75 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 16%
Computer Science 29 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 85 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,622,157
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#153
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,030
of 381,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.