↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Implications from China patient safety incidents reporting system

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Implications from China patient safety incidents reporting system
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s190117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinqiang Gao, Shipeng Yan, Wenqiong Wu, Rui Zhang, Yuliang Lu, Shuiyuan Xiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Lecturer 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 47 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 47 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,070
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,325
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.