↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering versus Spinal Fusion in Idiopathic Scoliosis from a US Integrated Healthcare Delivery System Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering versus Spinal Fusion in Idiopathic Scoliosis from a US Integrated Healthcare Delivery System Perspective
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2021
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s289459
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W Polly, A Noelle Larson, Amer F Samdani, William Rawlinson, Hannah Brechka, Alex Porteous, William Marsh, Richard Ditto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#495
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#394,859
of 454,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.