| Title |
Comparison of tumor markers using different detection devices [Retraction]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s115633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiangfan Shen, Rong Tao, Shaohua Tu, Chong Liu, Qi Yang, Zhu Min |
| Abstract |
[This retracts the article on p. 1083 in vol. 8, PMID: 26056472.]. |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,736,183
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#331
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,557
of 367,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#10
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.