↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of acceptance and distraction strategies in coping with experimentally induced pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s58559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hazel Moore, Ian Stewart, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Brian E McGuire

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#20,695,192
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,623
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,492
of 257,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.