↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adrenal insufficiency presenting as hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in International Medical Case Reports Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Adrenal insufficiency presenting as hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury
Published in
International Medical Case Reports Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s109840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung Won Ahn, Tong Yoon Kim, Sangmin Lee, Jeong Yeon Jeong, Hojoon Shim, Yu min Han, Kyu Eun Choi, Seok Joon Shin, Hye Eun Yoon

Abstract

Adrenal insufficiency is an uncommon cause of hypercalcemia and not easily considered as an etiology of adrenal insufficiency in clinical practice, as not all cases of adrenal insufficiency manifest as hypercalcemia. We report a case of secondary adrenal insufficiency presenting as hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury in a 66-year-old female. The patient was admitted to the emergency department with general weakness and poor oral intake. Hypercalcemia (11.5 mg/dL) and moderate renal dysfunction (serum creatinine 4.9 mg/dL) were shown in her initial laboratory findings. Studies for malignancy and hyperparathyroidism showed negative results. Basal cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone levels and adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test confirmed the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. With the administration of oral hydrocortisone, hypercalcemia was dramatically resolved within 3 days. This case shows that adrenal insufficiency may manifest as hypercalcemia and acute kidney injury, which implicates that adrenal insufficiency should be considered a cause of hypercalcemia in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,124,909
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#98
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,431
of 351,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.