| Title |
Brief behavioral treatment for patients with treatment-resistant insomnia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s110571 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jihui Wang, Qinling Wei, Xiaoli Wu, Zhiyong Zhong, Guanying Li |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the efficacy of brief behavioral treatment for insomnia (BBTI) in treating patients with treatment-resistant insomnia. Seventy-nine adults with treatment-resistant insomnia were randomly assigned to receive either individualized BBTI (delivered in two in-person sessions and two telephone "booster" sessions, n=40) or sleep hygiene education (n=39). The primary outcome was subjective (sleep diary) measures of self-report symptoms and questionnaire measures of Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), insomnia severity index (ISI), Epworth sleeping scale (ESS), and dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep scale (DBAS). The repeated-measures analysis of variance showed significant time effects between pretreatment and posttreatment in the scale ratings of PSQI, ESS, DBAS, ISI, sleep latency (SL), time in bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) in both groups and group × time interaction (F PSQI =3.893, F ESS =4.500, F DBAS =5.530, F ISI =15.070, F SL =8.909, F TIB =7.895, F SE =2.926, and F WASO =2.595). The results indicated significant differences between BBTI and sleep hygiene in change scores of PSQI, ESS, DBAS, ISI, SL, TIB, SE, and WASO. Effect sizes were moderate to large. BBTI is a simple and efficacious intervention for chronic insomnia in adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,869
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,441
of 381,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#71
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.