↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of pernicious anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 334)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Optimal management of pernicious anemia
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s25620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Andres, Khalid Serraj

Abstract

Pernicious anemia (also known as Biermer's disease) is an autoimmune atrophic gastritis, predominantly of the fundus, and is responsible for a deficiency in vitamin B12 (cobalamin) due to its malabsorption. Its prevalence is 0.1% in the general population and 1.9% in subjects over the age of 60 years. Pernicious anemia represents 20%-50% of the causes of vitamin B12 deficiency in adults. Given its polymorphism and broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, pernicious anemia is a great pretender. Its diagnosis must therefore be evoked and considered in the presence of neurological and hematological manifestations of undetermined origin. Biologically, it is characterized by the presence of anti-intrinsic factor antibodies. Treatment is based on the administration of parenteral vitamin B12, although other routes of administration (eg, oral) are currently under study. In the present update, these various aspects are discussed with special emphasis on data of interest to the clinician.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 27%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 54 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 57 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#338,056
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#7
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,632
of 188,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them