| Title |
Cycle Threshold Values in the Context of Multiple RT-PCR Testing for SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s282962 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Romero-Alvarez, Daniel Garzon-Chavez, Franklin Espinosa, Edison Ligña, Enrique Teran, Francisco Mora, Emilia Espin, Cristina Albán, Juan Miguel Galarza, Jorge Reyes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 10 | 34% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,685,575
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#50
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,599
of 455,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.