| Title |
The CHOICES Study: Facility Level Comparative Cost, Resource Utilization, and Outcomes Analysis of Myomectomy Compared to Transcervical Fibroid Ablation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s253891 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A Brooks, Allison M Singer, Dipak R Delvadia, David Forstein, Teresa J Beaudoin, Robert L Bauserman, Matt W Yuen, Carter A Little, April Zambelli-Weiner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,633,591
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#202
of 524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,647
of 434,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.