↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Fungal diseases: could nanostructured drug delivery systems be a novel paradigm for therapy?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Fungal diseases: could nanostructured drug delivery systems be a novel paradigm for therapy?
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s93105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Raquel Voltan, Guillermo Quindós, Kaila P Medina Alarcón, Ana Marisa Fusco-Almeida, Maria José Soares Mendes-Giannini, Marlus Chorilli

Abstract

Invasive mycoses are a major problem for immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. Morbidity and mortality rates of these infections are high because of late diagnosis and delayed treatment. Moreover, the number of available antifungal agents is low, and there are problems with toxicity and resistance. Alternatives for treating invasive fungal infections are necessary. Nanostructured systems could be excellent carriers for antifungal drugs, reducing toxicity and targeting their action. The use of nanostructured systems for antifungal therapy began in the 1990s, with the appearance of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. This review encompasses different antifungal drug delivery systems, such as liposomes, carriers based on solid lipids and nanostructure lipids, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, and others. All these delivery systems have advantages and disadvantages. Main advantages are the improvement in the antifungal properties, such as bioavailability, reduction in toxicity, and target tissue, which facilitates innovative therapeutic techniques. Conversely, a major disadvantage is the high cost of production. In the near future, the use of nanosystems for drug delivery strategies can be used for delivering peptides, including mucoadhesive systems for the treatment of oral and vaginal candidiasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 57 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Chemistry 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 70 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,298,886
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,684
of 4,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,468
of 381,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#46
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.