↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Emotional benefit of cosmetic camouflage in the treatment of facial skin conditions: personal experience and review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Emotional benefit of cosmetic camouflage in the treatment of facial skin conditions: personal experience and review
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2012
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s33860
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren L Levy, Jason J Emer

Abstract

Recent studies highlighting the psychological benefits of medical treatment for dermatological skin conditions have demonstrated a clear role for medical therapy in psychological health. Skin conditions, particularly those that are overtly visible, such as those located on the face, neck, and hands, often have a profound effect on the daily functioning of those affected. The literature documents significant emotional benefits using medical therapy in conditions such as acne, psoriasis, vitiligo, and rosacea, but there is little evidence documenting similar results with the use of cosmetic camouflage. Here we present a review highlighting the practical use of cosmetic camouflage makeup in patients with facial skin conditions and review its implications for psychological health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Lecturer 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 33%
Psychology 14 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,266,457
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#254
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,496
of 202,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.