↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

System 3 diagnostic process: the lateral approach

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
System 3 diagnostic process: the lateral approach
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s36859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taro Shimizu, Yasuharu Tokuda

Abstract

The process of obtaining diagnosis is described as a dual-process model, including the intuitive process, and the analytical process. The similarity between the two systems is that they both infer a diagnosis from patient-derived information. Here we present another process by which to elicit the diagnosis: asking direct questions of the patient themselves, such as "What do you think is the cause?" or "What do you suspect is wrong?" This simple method would enable us to elicit pivotal information for diagnosis. Asking patients direct questions allows them to think about the cause of their own problem and suggest their own diagnosis. This method of reasoning is completely different from the two above-mentioned systems and may represent a third approach. We highlight this third process as an important strategy, thereby using this third effective method of inquiry to facilitate quick and effective diagnosis in conjunction with former two systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,833,352
of 25,247,084 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#990
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,190
of 180,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.