The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Shoulder injuries in soccer goalkeepers: review and development of a FIFA 11+ shoulder injury prevention program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oajsm.s97917 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benno Ejnisman, Gisele Barbosa, Carlos V Andreoli, A de Castro Pochini, Thiago Lobo, Rodrigo Zogaib, Moises Cohen, Mario Bizzini, Jiri Dvorak |
| Abstract |
In the last years, shoulder injuries have represented an increasing health problem in soccer players. The goalkeepers are more exposed to shoulder disorders than other field players. Injury prevention exercises for upper limbs were cited in few studies involving throwing athletes, but we know that goalkeepers need a specific program. The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an adapted Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ program, namely the FIFA 11+ shoulder, which targets the prevention of shoulder injuries in soccer goalkeepers. The FIFA 11+ shoulder program is structured into three parts: general warming-up exercises, exercises to improve strength and balance of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger muscles, and advanced exercises for core stability and muscle control. The exercises were selected based on recommendations from studies demonstrating high electromyographic activity. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 13% |
| Spain | 13 | 7% |
| United States | 13 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 90 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 78% |
| Scientists | 26 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 308 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 19% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 100 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 86 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 115 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#342,275
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#9
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,757
of 383,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.