Title |
Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test in patients with severe and very severe COPD
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/copd.s174248 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henrik Hansen, Nina Beyer, Anne Frølich, Nina Godtfredsen, Theresa Bieler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 18% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Researcher | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 56 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 60 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,719,234
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,069
of 2,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,783
of 355,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#31
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.