↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Morphological Irregularity of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms is More Related with Aneurysm Size Rather Than Cerebrovascular Atherosclerosis: A Case-Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Morphological Irregularity of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms is More Related with Aneurysm Size Rather Than Cerebrovascular Atherosclerosis: A Case-Control Study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2021
DOI 10.2147/cia.s301326
Authors

Peng Qi, Xin Feng, Jun Lu, Junjie Wang, Shen Hu, Daming Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,547,486
of 20,881,490 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,567
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,328
of 331,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,881,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.