| Title |
A Working Hypothesis on Vesicular Lesions Related to COVID-19 Infection, Koebner Phenomena Type V, and a Short Review of Related Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s307846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alin Laurentiu Tatu, Liliana Baroiu, Silvia Fotea, Lucretia Anghel, Eduard Drima Polea, Thomas Nadasdy, Valentin Chioncel, Lawrence Chukwudi Nwabudike |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#451
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,377
of 453,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.