↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reducing the iron burden and improving survival in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Reducing the iron burden and improving survival in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients: current perspectives
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s61540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karim Bayanzay, Lama Alzoebie

Abstract

Hypertransfusion regimens for thalassemic patients revolutionized the management of severe thalassemia; transforming a disease which previously led to early infant death into a chronic condition. The devastating effect of the accrued iron from chronic blood transfusions necessitates a more finely tuned approach to limit the complications of the disease, as well as its treatment. A comprehensive approach including carefully tailored transfusion protocol, continuous monitoring and assessment of total body iron levels, and iron chelation are currently the mainstay in treating iron overload. There are also indications for ancillary treatments, such as splenectomy and fetal hemoglobin induction. The main cause of death in iron overload continues to be related to cardiac complications. However, since the widespread use of iron chelation started in the 1970s, there has been a general improvement in survival in these patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 23 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#242
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,207
of 366,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.