Title |
Misdiagnosis of patients receiving inhaled therapies in primary care
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/copd.s11123 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
José Luis Izquierdo, Antonio Martín, Pilar de Lucas, José Miguel Rodríguez-González-Moro, Carlos Almonacid, Alexandra Paravisini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 65% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,088,741
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#177
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,286
of 103,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them