| Title |
Enhanced oral bioavailability of docetaxel by lecithin nanoparticles: preparation, in vitro, and in vivo evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s32880 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaili Hu, Shan Cao, Fuqiang Hu, Jianfang Feng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,149
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#36
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.