| Title |
Cellulose nanofiber aerogel as a promising biomaterial for customized oral drug delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s124318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jyoti Bhandari, Harshita Mishra, Pawan Kumar Mishra, Rupert Wimmer, Farhan J Ahmad, Sushama Talegaonkar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#567
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,441
of 328,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#19
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.