↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Screening for neonatal deafness in resource-poor countries: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Neonatology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Screening for neonatal deafness in resource-poor countries: challenges and solutions
Published in
Research and Reports in Neonatology, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/rrn.s61862
Authors

Bolajoko Olusanya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,689,826
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,059
of 279,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them