The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Phytochemical Screening and in-vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Activities of Echinops amplexicaulis, Ruta chalepensis and Salix subserrata Against Selected Pathogenic Bacterial Strains in West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of experimental pharmacology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jep.s305936 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lencho Megersa Marami, Getachew Mulatu Dilba, Dagmawit Atalel Babele, Edilu Jorga Sarba, Askale Gizaw, Wakuma Mitiku Bune, Morka Dandecha Bayu, Petros Admasu, Abraham Mekbeb, Miressa Tadesse, Kebede Abdisa, Dejene Bayisa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#17,578,475
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#73
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,636
of 459,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.