| Title |
The clinical impact of serrated colorectal polyps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s106257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brendon M O’Connell, Seth D Crockett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 25% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,682,308
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#304
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,985
of 422,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.