↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Emerging technologies for the detection of melanoma: achieving better outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Emerging technologies for the detection of melanoma: achieving better outcomes
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, November 2012
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s27902
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cila Herman

Abstract

Every year around 2.5-3 million skin lesions are biopsied in the US, and a fraction of these - between 50,000 and 100,000 - are diagnosed as melanoma. Diagnostic instruments that allow early detection of melanoma are the key to improving survival rates and reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies, the associated morbidity, and the costs of care. Advances in technology over the past 2 decades have enabled the development of new, sophisticated test methods, which are currently undergoing laboratory and small-scale clinical testing. This review highlights and compares some of the emerging technologies that hold the promise of melanoma diagnosis at an early stage of the disease. The needs for detection at different levels (patient, primary care, specialized care) are discussed, and three broad classes of instruments are identified that are capable of satisfying these needs. Technical and clinical requirements on the diagnostic instruments are introduced to aid the comparison and evaluation of new technologies. White- and polarized-light imaging, spatial and spectroscopic multispectral methods, quantitative thermographic imaging, confocal microscopy, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), and Terahertz (THZ) imaging methods are highlighted in light of the criteria identified in the review. Based on the properties, possibilities, and limitations of individual methods, those best suited for a particular setting are identified. Challenges faced in development and wide-scale application of novel technologies are addressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Physics and Astronomy 7 10%
Computer Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,278,043
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#349
of 900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,832
of 202,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.