| Title |
Presbyopia – A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s259011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James A Katz, Paul M Karpecki, Alexandra Dorca, Sima Chiva-Razavi, Heather Floyd, Elizabeth Barnes, Mark Wuttke, Eric Donnenfeld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Researcher | 9 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 134 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 136 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#960,487
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#62
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,227
of 455,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.