Title |
Screening and treatments using telemedicine in retinopathy of prematurity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Eye and Brain, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/eb.s94440 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aristomenis Thanos, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Bozho Todorich, Darius M Moshfeghi, Michael T Trese |
Abstract |
Several studies have validated the role of telemedicine as a new powerful screening and diagnostic tool for retinal disorders, such as diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity. With regard to retinopathy of prematurity, bedside examination with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy has been the gold standard technique for screening, yet with several limitations. Herein, we review the current evidence that supports the role of telemedicine for the screening of infants with retinopathy of prematurity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 19% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 24% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,689,826
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Eye and Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,426
of 382,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye and Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them