↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Defining Criteria for Guiding Cancer Patients to Find a Reputable Complementary Medicine Provider: Results of a Literature Review and a Consensus Procedure

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Defining Criteria for Guiding Cancer Patients to Find a Reputable Complementary Medicine Provider: Results of a Literature Review and a Consensus Procedure
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, April 2020
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s230705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alizé A Rogge, Isabel Baur, Gabriele Blettner, Ulrike Holtkamp, Markus Horneber, Patrick Jahn, Stefanie Joos, Silva Keberle, Anita Kettelgerdes, David Klemperer, Alfred Längler, Petra Voiß, Joachim Weis, Claudia M Witt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,786,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#302
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,432
of 396,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.