↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

EGF and curcumin co-encapsulated nanoparticle/hydrogel system as potent skin regeneration agent

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
EGF and curcumin co-encapsulated nanoparticle/hydrogel system as potent skin regeneration agent
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s104350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoling Li, Xianlong Ye, Jianying Qi, Rangrang Fan, Xiang Gao, Yunzhou Wu, Liangxue Zhou, Aiping Tong, Gang Guo

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex multifactorial process that relies on coordinated signaling molecules to succeed. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a mitogenic polypeptide that stimulates wound repair; however, precise control over its application is necessary to reduce the side effects and achieve desired therapeutic benefits. Moreover, the extensive oxidative stress during the wound healing process generally inhibits repair of the injured tissues. Topical applications of antioxidants like curcumin (Cur) could protect tissues from oxidative damage and significantly improve tissue remodeling. To achieve much accelerated wound healing effects, we designed a novel dual drug co-loaded in situ gel-forming nanoparticle/hydrogel system (EGF-Cur-NP/H) which acted not only as a supportive matrix for the regenerative tissue, but also as a sustained drug depot for EGF and Cur. In the established excisional full-thickness wound model, EGF-Cur-NP/H treatment significantly enhanced wound closure through increasing granulation tissue formation, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis, relative to normal saline, nanoparticle/hydrogel (NP/H), Cur-NP/H, and EGF-NP/H treated groups. In conclusion, this study provides a biocompatible in situ gel-forming system for efficient topical application of EGF and Cur in the landscape of tissue repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 12%
Unspecified 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 45 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,594
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,911
of 381,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.