↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on bariatric surgical procedures and an introduction to the implantable weight loss device: the Maestro Rechargeable System

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Update on bariatric surgical procedures and an introduction to the implantable weight loss device: the Maestro Rechargeable System
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/mder.s106223
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie S Hwang, Mark C Takata, Ken Fujioka, William Fuller

Abstract

There are many different methods of treating obesity, ranging from various medical options to several surgical therapies. This paper briefly summarizes current surgical options for weight loss with a focus on one of the newest US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for surgical weight loss therapy, the Maestro Rechargeable System. Also known as the vagal blocking for obesity control implantable device, this tool blocks vagal nerve activity to induce weight loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 10 31%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#102
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,176
of 381,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.