| Title |
A single-center study evaluating the effect of the controlled adverse environment (CAEsm) model on tear film stability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s33905 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Abelson, Keith J Lane, John Rodriguez, Patrick Johnston, Endri Angjeli, George Ousler, Douglas Montgomery |
| Abstract |
To investigate use of an improved ocular tear film analysis protocol (OPI 2.0) in the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE(SM)) model of dry eye disease, and to examine the utility of new metrics in the identification of subpopulations of dry eye patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,339,368
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#481
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,716
of 202,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.