↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia: challenges and solutions
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s100816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrid Herskovitz, Mariya Miteva

Abstract

Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA) is the most common scarring alopecia among African American women. Data about epidemiology, etiology, genetic inheritance, and management are scarce and come from individual reports or small series. CCCA has been associated with hot combing and traumatic hair styling for years; however, studies fail to confirm it as the sole etiologic factor. It has been shown in a small series that CCCA can be inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, with a partial penetrance and a strong modifying effect of hairstyling and sex. CCCA presents clinically as a central area of progressive irreversible hair loss that expands to the periphery. A patchy form has also been described. Dermoscopy is helpful to identify the optimal site for the biopsy, which establishes the diagnosis. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to discover the optimal management. At this point, patients are advised to avoid traction and chemical treatments; topical and intralesional steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and minoxidil can be helpful in halting the progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,792,736
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#135
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,131
of 381,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.