↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

E-cigarettes for the management of nicotine addiction

Overview of attention for article published in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
E-cigarettes for the management of nicotine addiction
Published in
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/sar.s94264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Knight-West, Christopher Bullen

Abstract

In this review, we discuss current evidence on electronic cigarettes (ECs), a rapidly evolving class of nicotine delivery system, and their role in managing nicotine addiction, specifically in helping smokers to quit smoking and/or reduce the amount of tobacco they smoke. The current evidence base is limited to three randomized trials (only one compares ECs with nicotine replacement therapy) and a growing number of EC user surveys (n=6), case reports (n=4), and cohort studies (n=8). Collectively, these studies suggest modest cessation efficacy and a few adverse effects, at least with the short-term use. On this basis, we provide advice for health care providers on providing balanced information for patients who enquire about ECs. More research, specifically well-conducted large efficacy trials comparing ECs with standard smoking cessation management (eg, nicotine replacement therapy plus behavioral support) and long-term prospective studies for adverse events, are urgently needed to fill critical knowledge gaps on these products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Other 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Psychology 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,654,450
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#35
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,427
of 381,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.