↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The onset of rheumatoid arthritis following trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 188)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The onset of rheumatoid arthritis following trauma
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2016
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s110560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur E Brawer, Noopur Goel

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is known to have many predisposing factors. We studied individuals whose RA was initiated by physical injuries. Sixty patients (43 females), previously well, developed RA following trauma. No other known environmental or familial influences were present. Fourteen sustained a fracture; of the 46 who did not, 36 sustained multiple injuries that in part involved the axial skeleton. Subsequent unremitting daily pain, stiffness, limited motion, pain on motion, and/or swelling in the injured areas were mandatory for inclusion. Nine months after injuries (span: 2 weeks-36 months), more obvious signs of inflammation (IM) appeared in multiple other joints that were previously not affected by the original trauma. In those with laboratory tests done prior to the spread of IM (30/60), 22 (73%) were normal until an average 8 months after the spread of IM. Of the entire cohort of 60, only 23% had a positive rheumatoid factor, but 43% had a positive antinuclear antibody. It seems apparent that any severe trauma to a joint may precipitate an ongoing localized chronic inflammatory disorder for an indefinite period of time, which may then lead to the spread of IM to multiple other joints. The initiation of RA following trauma warrants consideration as a legitimate entity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,284,288
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#28
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,386
of 381,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them