| Title |
Connecting research discovery with care delivery in dementia: the development of the Indianapolis Discovery Network for Dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s36078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malaz A Boustani, Amie Frame, Stephanie Munger, Patrick Healey, Jessie Westlund, Martin Farlow, Ann Hake, Mary Guerriero Austrom, Polly Shepard, Corby Bubp, Jose Azar, Arif Nazir, Nadia Adams, Noll L Campbell, Azita Chehresa, Paul Dexter |
| Abstract |
The US Institute of Medicine has recommended an integrated, locally sensitive collaboration among the various members of the community, health care systems, and research organizations to improve dementia care and dementia research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 107 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2012.
All research outputs
#3,310,849
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#343
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,003
of 202,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.