↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluation of Cannula Safety in Injection of Poly-L-Lactic Acid

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Cannula Safety in Injection of Poly-L-Lactic Acid
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, June 2021
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s305479
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Nikolis, Luiz E Avelar, Kaitlyn M Enright

Abstract

Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) has been used in various medical applications for decades, including aesthetic ones. The use of a cannula technique in injecting PLLA has been proposed in order to lower the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) following treatment. Such AEs include nodule formation, which may occur less frequently by fanning the product with a cannula, thus creating a more uniform product placement compared to that resulting from the use of a needle. Currently, however, there is a lack of comparative research regarding the safety of cannulas versus needles for PLLA injections, as the selection of either remains highly subjective. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the safety of cannula use in the administration of PLLA, in order to report safety outcomes. A single-center, retrospective chart review was conducted to examine the data of patients who had previously undergone treatment with PLLA in the form of Sculptra® Aesthetic™ in the face and/or neck regions. Twenty-seven subject charts met eligibility. Descriptive data regarding treatment and follow-up visits were collected and analyzed. A total of seven AEs resulted from eighty-two treatment sessions (8.54%), with 6/27 patients having experienced at least one AE (22.22%). Mild bruising was the most commonly reported AE (57.14%). The majority of the AEs were mild and transient in nature, with one moderate AE being a nodule that was possibly related to a concomitant treatment. All AEs were resolved with follow-up care. Mild AEs such as bruising, swelling and pain should be expected following the use of a cannula for PLLA injections. However, the incidence rates of AEs following treatment can remain low if proper product preparation and treatment techniques are utilized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Unspecified 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#498
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,499
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.