| Title |
Enhancing Specific Health Literacy with a Digital Evidence-Based Patient Decision Aid for Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s311470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Wehkamp, Felicia Beatrice Kiefer, Friedemann Geiger, Fueloep Scheibler, Jens Ulrich Rueffer, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Cornelia Betsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,661,927
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#291
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,265
of 463,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.