↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The management of hyperphosphatemia by lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The management of hyperphosphatemia by lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s15466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Shigematsu, Yuri Nakashima, Masaki Ohya, Koichi Tatsuta, Daisuke Koreeda, Wataru Yoshimoto, Shintaro Yamanaka, Toshifumi Sakaguchi, Yoshiyuki Hanba, Toru Mima, Shigeo Negi

Abstract

Hyperphosphatemia has been shown to be involved not only in the onset and progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism but also in vascular calcification. In addition, it influences the clinical course of patients with chronic kidney disease. Phosphate (Pi) binder is required in the management of hyperparaphosphatemia, because dietary Pi restriction and Pi removal by hemodialysis alone are insufficient. Lanthanum carbonate, a powerful Pi binder, has a similar effect to aluminum hydroxide in reducing serum Pi levels. As it is excreted via the liver, lanthanum carbonate has an advantage in patients with renal failure. The effect of lanthanum carbonate on serum Pi levels is almost two times higher than that of calcium (Ca) carbonate, which is commonly used. Lanthanum carbonate and Ca carbonate have an additive effect. Worldwide, there is 6 years worth of clinical treatment data on lanthanum carbonate; however, we have 3 years of clinical use in Japanese patients with hyperphosphatemia. No serious side effects have been reported. However, the most important concern is bone toxicity, which has been observed with use of aluminum hydroxide. For this study, clinical research involved analysis of bone biopsies. Although osteomalacia is the most noticeable side effect, this was not observed. Both the high- and the low-turnover bone disease concentrated into a normal bone turnover state. However, as the authors have less than 10 years' clinical experience with lanthanum carbonate, patients should be monitored carefully. In addition, it is necessary to demonstrate whether potent treatment effects on hyperphosphatemia improve the long-term outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Other 6 24%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#222
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,968
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.