The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Total Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Errors and Evaluation of the Analytical Quality Control Using Sigma Metric for Routine Clinical Chemistry Tests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s286679 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mulugeta Teshome, Abebaw Worede, Daniel Asmelash |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 73 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,974,748
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#199
of 1,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,562
of 530,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.