↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2021
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s302682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Slavcev, Allison Spinelli, Elisabeth Absalon, Tara Masterson, Christoph Heuck, Annette Lam, Erwin De Cock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 13 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,358,243
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#70
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,806
of 460,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.