↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost-Effectiveness of Domiciliary High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment in COPD Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Domiciliary High Flow Nasal Cannula Treatment in COPD Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2021
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s312523
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen, Line Hust Storgaard, Ulla Møller Weinreich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Unspecified 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,288,195
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#67
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,534
of 461,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.