| Title |
The preparation of 3,5-dihydroxy-4-isopropylstilbene nanoemulsion and in vitro release
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s17242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yue Zhang, Jungang Gao, Hetang Zheng, Ran Zhang, Yucui Han |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,845,005
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#274
of 4,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,436
of 121,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.