↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recurrent pericarditis: current challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Recurrent pericarditis: current challenges and future prospects
Published in
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/rrcc.s87827
Authors

Claire Dauphin, Etienne Merlin, Aurélie Chalard, Romain Trésorier, Jean-René Lusson, Martin Soubrier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,689,826
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,374
of 368,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them