Title |
Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Underestimation of Percutaneous Biopsy and Positivity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in a Brazilian Public Hospital
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast cancer targets and therapy, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/bctt.s314447 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rafael da Silva Sá, Angela Flávia Logullo, Simone Elias, Gil Facina, Vanessa Monteiro Sanvido, Afonso Celso Pinto Nazário |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 40% |
Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,602,824
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#84
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,394
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.